Цитата:
Сообщение от Sea-Time
Если Вы так считаете, то попробуйте найти в интернете хоть одну (!) подделку этой модели. С Ваших слов создается впечатление, что сеть завалена такими предложениями.
|
Да без проблем модель довольно подделываемая, сам с такой сталкивался год назад, а если в гугл вбить в поиск "Fake Tissot Carson T71.3.442.32" то результатов будет масса (скрины на фото ниже). Нанесение надписей и прочие нюансы могут зависеть от уровня подделки (плюс еще далеко не все подделки с точностью могут совпадать с тем что представлены на картинке на сайтах), как то например обсуждение подделок Tissot на смежном форуме
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f62/how...234250-11.html А вот подделка которую в СЦ в Австралии с трудом отличили
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f62/can...ed-701506.html темка там очень интересная в отношении подделок Tissot, но она на английском, а так советую ознакомиться, особенно с постом №130 в теме, где двое человек из официального СЦ не смогли по началу распознать подделку. Вот копипаст из той темы-
"Thanks for that. Your help has been much appreciated.
I took it to the only Swatch group headquarters in Australia today and they concluded (after having 3 people assess it) that it was a counterfeit, one of the best they'd ever seen.
At first it was inspected by two servicemen who both thought it was genuine, though weren't 100% confident in saying so. It was then taken to another watchmaker who has been working for Swatch for 30 years or something and at first he said it was genuine as well. Based on appearances. Though he opened the case and this is what I was told (I wasn't actually allowed to step into the labs, had to wait in reception for the one of the customer assistants to bring back the info.)
The contraption (a claw she called it) fit perfectly and seamlessly into the slots on the back of the case (apparently not always the case with replicas) When they took the case back off, the correct battery was being used, and then I got a bit confused with what she said (not knowing all the names of the inside parts of watches) Basically she said that there was a 'seal' in the watch that is present in all Tissot watches, though is constructed as one for Tissots. In my watch it was two separate parts welded (very well apparently) together.
This was conclusive enough for them apparently to deem it a replica. I asked her of the movement and she said that they didn't bother examining the movement because the people that make the replica can obtain these movements somehow... or fake them or something?
I showed her my warranty card and asked her if it was completely fake, she was puzzled I had one (stamped too) and took it back in again for inspection (I asked her here to please tell me if they could give me any details as to the quality of the movement inside, she said yes). To my disappointment when she came back she said again nothing about the movement and that they didn't check, and rather said that when they input the serial number into the database nothing came up for the watch.
The receptionist (woman helping) also noted the difference in the colour of the dial and sub dials. She said that to me herself, that it was the only thing that indicated to her it was a replica (exterior) and that the two tones were much just that bit too different.
So it seems I do have a fake watch. Do you think it's worth trying to find a 3rd party watch maker who will be able to open it and have me examine the movement with him?
I'll be sending the seller a message about it too. See what he has to say. "
Цитата:
Сообщение от Martello
Спасибо за поправку. Действительно, шкала с разметкой до 400 у модели T71.3.442.11. Но у них другая фактура циферблата.
Здесь похоже на котлету. При сборке вставили полуфабрикат циферблата типа T71.3.442.32, с ненанесённым лого, а диск со шкалой типа T71.3.442.11.
|
Тут такой нюанс, на сколько я вижу то тахиметрическая шкала там не отдельная деталь циферблата, соответственно это одна деталь, то есть как можно отдельно шкалу взять от другой модели (хотя могу ошибаться)